UPTET- hc says-the applicants, who were not even eligible� to make an application in terms of the advertisement dated 30.11.2011 � are neither necessary nor proper party in the present writ petition. Their application is therefore rejected
?Court No. - 38
Civil Misc. Intervener Application No.5013 of 2013.
��������������������������������� IN
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39674 of 2012
Petitioner :- Akhilesh Tripathi & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav
Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
The applicants, who are six in number, seek intervention in the present proceedings. From the records, it is apparent that all the applicants had completed two years BTC training course from DIET at Allahabad in the year 2012. The exact date of completion of the BTC training has been disclosed as 17.12.2012 in paragraph 12 of the present application.
This writ petition has been filed for quashing of the Government Order dated 26.07.2012. By means of the amendment application, prayer has been made to quash the Government Order dated� 31.08.2012, whereby the State Government decided to treat TET examination as a eligibility qualification and has decided to cancel the earlier advertisement, whereunder an assurance was notified that the candidates who have passed TET examination, shall be offered appointment on the basis of the marks secured in the said examination only.� The petitioners have also prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to complete the process of appointment as per the advertisement dated 30.11.2011.
In my opinion, the applicants, who were not even eligible� to make an application in terms of the advertisement dated 30.11.2011 � are neither necessary nor proper party in the present writ petition. Their application is therefore rejected. However, a right is reserved� in their favour to assist the Court during the course of arguments.
Order Date :- 9.1.2013.
Rks.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment